(in)conspicuous affections II

(in)conspicuous affections comprises of two “rings”, each meant to be worn by two people at one time.

the flowers adorning the rings are meant to both veil the contact between two people, while also simultaneously drawing attention to the beauty of queer affection, and perhaps even the intimacy that can arise from having to keep something hidden from view. veiling the touch references the ways in which queer affection is often hidden from view (or criminalized).

(in)conspicuous affections II is adorned with an African violet, a sapphic symbol of affection dating back to 600 BCE, that once recognized as a symbol of lesbianism in 1927, was vilified and violet sales dramatically plummeted.

too, the positioning of the ring bands calls towards a choreography of queer touch; often teetering the line between friends and lovers, often out of necessity so as to maintain ambiguity in public, sometimes just out of confusion. both the size and positioning of the almost-but-not-quite-separate ring bands ask the wearer(s) to engage with ambiguity, and the intimacy involved in navigating it. ultimately, the work brings visibility to the sometimes-complicated nature of queer love and the process of hiding/being visible. 

Previous
Previous

(in)conspicuous affections I

Next
Next

where we go to ground ourselves